The History of Humanity

Project: The History of Humanity
Author: Lem Chuck Moth

Started date: April/01/2019
Last updated: June/30/2019
All right reserved.
Since this paper is still drafted, the readers would be advised to ignore any context errors. The content is not final and subjected to be reviewed.

With the support of the logistical methodology, we had argued that history could be made as a part of logistical science (Historical Science: History as a Branch of logistical Science: The Logistical Methodology). From its progressive conception, historical science could be applied to a broader range of subject ranging from a simple entity to a complex creature and its related life-sustaining field of knowledge. On its own development, modern history could be compiled entirely from historical records that are made available through the progression of science and technology. Unfortunately, this ideal situation does not always apply in reality. Controlled by the New World order of today, history had been for a long while subjected to manipulation by selected historians themselves. Personal and political bias were two among the causes of historical distortion in such a way that history could no longer secure its scientific reality. From one state to another, a specific version of history is being compiled and is being taught to public schools, following the same colonial model of European source. Amid the setback, efforts had been made by conscientious independent minds in the drive to bring up the real history of humanity back to light. Resistance however occurs when fear of changes that might undermine current political order worldwide was seen to treat the stability of the current world order. Despite all the setback, we have the reason to believe that the movement would be strong enough to break through the current colonial legacies of bad practices. With political bias set aside, the history of humanity could then be at last freed from obscurity for humanity to consume without any fear of political reprisal. Cross-referencing with different sources makes modern history much more complete and empirically more verifiable (Notes: Cross-referencing in Historical Science). Not only that authenticity of the sources could be verified, but discrepancies could be more identifiable and often enough corrected through mutual checked out. Along with the age of enlightenment, scientific progression provides a rigorous way of writing history along with the effectiveness of recording historical events help humanity in its own quest for preserving the truth of its past development.

The Search for the Historical Truth
Unlike the cosmos that preserves its past record through its traveling image, humanity was incurring changes through its space and time chronology axes. In a series of evolution that left no images of its past development, humanity is simply deprived of its deep past records. Going back time, historical records are less and less available that forced scholars to create their own theories to patch-up the missing links. As more and more scientific breakthrough allowed Scientists to use empirical methods successfully to retrieve historical facts from many fields of science for the construction of the deep past, the compiling of the history of humanity had got itself a big boost during the last century. Through their own recovery efforts, the history of each country and community had been developed fairly as separate entity to become each nation's identity and a sense of justification for their statehood. Nevertheless, precaution should be on guard, as discrepancies also loom larger due mostly to the incompleteness of the empirical data that were so far used as foundation of their constructions. Common mistakes so far found are the attempts to construct historical events from empirical data without cross-referencing with other sources. In addition, the unified history of humanity as a whole is always a challenge and is still lagging behind. Even at this current stage where recording method and mean are made easier through computerization, history always fall short when it comes to humanity 's political development. When dealing with prehistory, we had argued that tradition is one important source of historical data too valuable to be left unconsulted (Prehistory: Introduction: Tradition as a Source of Prehistoric Data). On the other hand, religion went ahead of oral tradition in preserving historical data through written mean of recording. The Bible's book of Genesis, in particular, contains deep past information on western development that otherwise unavailable in any other source. If proper reference to its Sumerian heritage could be made, they constitute the source of information that stand through time to be available as eyewitness to the development of humanity. Following the Buddhist time-line chronology, we shall trace back the history of the earth and its related knowledge of life through tradition and other unconventional records available through out religious practices of the world.

In their study of cosmology, many scholars had come to the conclusion that our earth presented itself as a specific formation that could support life. Even though skepticism still hold strong among scientific institution against the religious claim of god's creation, many were convinced that the suitability of our solar system to sustain life on earth was far to be a coincidence. For the Meru Culture, the earth, heaven and hell is actually the recycling center that is run by the congress of gods. To support the claim, Southeast Asia has its own long lasting tradition that the earth was from the beginning serving as the recycling center of living souls for the universe. For Christianity, the observation is quite in tune with the Bible's book of Genesis of God creation (Notes: Of God's Creation).

The Origin of Gods
The earliest information so far of the origin of gods was from Southeast Asia. It started with the divine settlement on earth as recounted by the Bahnar Roh, one of the subgroups of the Khmer-Mon stock (MGRV: The Bahnar: Legendary History). Their tradition of the settlement of two offspring of the god Bok Kei on earth indicated clearly an extraterrestrial origin of the gods on earth. The tradition also credited the god Bok Kei as the creator of the earth that was according to science, closely associated with the formation of our solar system. Delusioned or not, the Bahnar Roh tribesmen were specific in their tradition that was supported by other religious societies of the world. Many human communities through out the globe still retained tradition about theirs gods establishing with them and taught them the ways of living and the establishment of a human culture to be different from that of animals. They were actually descended from the two offspring of the god Bok Kei who later spread themselves into the globe and constituted the race of gods as acknowledged later in both Hindu and Buddhist tradition. Many credible religious schools that were derived from the Meru Culture had plenty to say about their origin and the purpose of their journeys on the surface of the earth. On the forefront of them all, Brahmanism stated that they were from the Brahma world and that their settlement on earth was primary concerning of their ultimate salvation to eternal life. Their tradition confirm that at first they could go back to their extraterrestrial home; some says that it was through a silver ladder while other went far to hint of elaborate carriers for their trips. Earth was created as a place where they could detach themselves from sensational restraints of their native world that prevent them from going back to their original self of which Buddhist calls the state of enlightenment. As Buddha Gautama went into the deep forest to get his own, high spirits from the Brahma world came to the earth to complete their Arahantship. Supporting the statement, Buddhist tradition went far to confirm that during the early days of earth creation, Buddhas were of high numbers as an old expression saying " you could not walk on the surface of the earth without stepping on the bone of a Buddha". It was another way of saying that the earth was created to suit the enlightenment process and that Brahmans came to take the advantage that the earth was made to offer. The sad part is that as many of them succeeded, there were also many others who failed. Tradition says that the silver ladder then disappeared leaving the extraterrestrial souls to fend for themselves on earth. When that happened, an accommodation had been set in place to allow them to continue on their quest for salvation. Unlike other worlds, earth was created to shelter other creatures as well and, with a lot less distractions, constituted an environment that serves as a second home for the lost souls. A physical body that would accommodate each soul to live a physical life on earth would provide the soul with the second chance to succeeed. Nevertheless, earthy sensation also tempts it to lose the drive for the ultimate salvation. It required a higher authority to, along with the sophistication of his past merit, lead the souls to be on the righ track for salvation. Born with high spirituality, a Buddhisatva reincarnates many times to teach morality and to rule the world according to the Buddhist law of dharma. After attaining his own enlightenment, he became known as the supreme Buddha to reign over humanity until the end of his kalpa. What makes a supreme Buddha to qualify for the mission, is his aptitude to guide humanity toward enlightenment after achieving his own. For that, he needs high merits that were painstakingly acquired through experiencing different lives (of different shape and form) and understands how all physical and spiritual sub-worlds interconnect. During his kalpa as a Buddhisatva, he had to interface effectively with divinities and supernatural spirits that are in control of the Meru World (that includes the earth, the heaven and the hell). To illustrate the dynamic of divine interference, a kalpa is divided into four yugas: Satyayuga, Tretayuga, Dvaparayuga and the Kalayuga are due to the interfacing period between the earth and each one of the spiritual worlds during each yuga. As the Brahma and the Meru world are the farthest, only spirits could travel from these sub-worlds to earth. In that case, divine spirits from either the Brahma or the Meru world would intervene on humanity through reincarnation during the Satyayuga and the Tretayuga. In contrast, being closer to earth, the occurrence of a shortest path (wormhole in scientific term) between the heaven and hell to earth would accommodate physical traveling during the Dvaparayuga and the Kalayuga of this current kalpa. According to Buddhist cosmogony, many kalpas had come to pass during which the environment and requirement of the earth is conditioned to sustain human souls through its living organism (Notes: Previous Known Buddhist Kalpas).

The Conception of the Kamara People
The Bible's book of Genesis clearly mentions that the creation of human beings was done by God during the sixth of God creation 's days.
And God said . Let us make man in our image, after our likeliness and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over he fowl of the air , and over the cattle, and over the earth , and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.(HB: 1/26: p. 1)
It is important to note that the word "God" in capital letter is actually a title of the godfather. His statement, seemingly addressing to fellow gods about his intention of creating human being in their image, was to Christians a proof of human creation by God himself. Another implication of his statement is that gods had then the same form as modern men of today. As we had argued, any of god intervention after the disappearance of the silver ladder must to be done in this physical form. Scientists who stomps on the fossils or remains of a homo-sapien that dated prior to the Toba explosion, might actually stomp on the remain of a god and not of a man (Notes: God's Physical Body). By then, archaic human beings had different form and their remains could not be mistaken as of a homo-sapien. From his statement, God planned to make homo-sapien as the standard form of both god and man. No mention on how he did it, but we know that it was certainly not the same way that the great master of magic Houdini makes a rabbit appearing and disappearing at will. The best hint so far is from the Sumerian source and that both the supernatural and natural processes are involved (Historical Science: Relativity in Historical Science: The Buddhist Law of Evolution). Collaborating on the Buddhist law of macroevolution (in the formation of new species), the Mnong' s account of human appearance on earth states that originally, men lived with animals and spoke the same language (The Man Race: Introduction). Theirs tradition went further to assert that the diversion (between men and animals) came later and that it took a catastrophic event to make the transformation. The assertion convinces us that a macroevolution had under-changed human from animals, concerning not only physiology but life-style as well. Following the lead, we shall look back for any Sotheast Asian catastrophic event that happen in the near past time frame. It was actually the eruption of the Toba volcano that happened at Sumatra around 74,000 years ago. Archeology confirms that the eruption had triggered a drastic change of life in Southeast Asia. Before the eruption, scholars had verified that a continuos Paleolithic tradition of archaic societies that was known as the Kota Tampan culture, had existed as early as to ten of thousands of years ago. The explosion specifically blanketed the Indian subcontinents in a deep layer of ash leading to the conclusion that India's first colonist did not survive this greatest of all disasters. Scholars predict a broad extinction zone between east and west Asia that results in the deep east-west division in the genetic and cultural difference (OOE: Why and when did we leave Africa?, p.82). The first implication could be drawn from the Sumerian epic story of Enuma Elish about the split of the Brahma community into two separate communities of Apsu and Tiamat. As Apsu is traditionally located at mount Himalayas, Tiamat was located in its southern seashore, which in the current geographical setting located at the northeastern part of India (at Manipura). The split reflects the gradual shift of the Brahma world in the lost control of the earth under the increasing interference of both the Indra and the Yuma worlds on its politic since the start of the Bhadrakalpas. While the small Brahman community kept its tradition of pure Brahman ancestry, the big Brahman community absorbed a broader range of leadership from the Indra and the Yuma worlds. Back to the Mnong's statement, we conclude that the Toba catastrophic event produced the first modern human to populate Southeast Asia. The oldest incontrovertible evidence for modern humans in Southeast Asia, at Niah Cave in Borneo, includes a modern skull dated to 42,000 years overlaying a Middle Paleolithic flake industry said to be typical of the Indian 'Soan' Middle Paleolithic (OOE: When did we become modern?: Human migrants using similar technology: p. 100). While the Malay peninsular became since the country of the first indigenous austroasiatic speakers, the Orang Asli and the Senoi indigenous people, evidences of austroasiatic speakers in some part of India and the mainland Indochina might have been dated at the same time. Buddhist tradition later on commemorates Jambudvipa as the birth place of the five Buddhas of the Bhadrakalpa as no other than the new country of the austroasiatic people. Living closely with the gods of both the small and big Brahman communities, their tradition had plenty to say about the interference of gods on their living communities as part of the Man and later the Meru Culture' s development.

The Incompleteness of Empirical Data
As its current stage, the history of humanity is compiled entirely based on the Darwinist theory of natural selection process that leaves out the spiritual role completely in the development of human specie. Leaving God out of the equation, mistakes were committed when empirical data from DNA analysis and linguistic study were used without cross-referencing with religion. Having no specific origin and date stamps coming along with them, empirical data are often incomplete and fell short of providing full answer to the history of humanity. To find out about the extra information, historians had to recourse to separate process in order to date and locate the events. For most of the cases, the window of uncertainty is wide and the mistake of interpretation is high when applying to the space-time bound historical events of the past. To make the matter worst, current bad practices now limit historians to rely on their own empirical judgment or on scientific theories that are currently still very much unproved. The most vulnerable of them all is the ethnographic study of which many forms of historical information had been drawn and used extensively to support other discoveries in modern historical science. Having been refuting both the Darwinist theory of specieation through natural selection process and the scientific theory on the origin of life (Historical Science: Relativity in Historical Science), we shall look for expected discrepancies of scientific claim on the history of humanity as currently accepted by scientific communities of today. Adding religion into the equation might not provide additional empirical data to scholars, but can open more horizon for alternative views that could provide better answers to historical dilemmas than using empirical method alone. Cross-referencing to religion, a process that scientific communities had been neglecting for all along, not only could provide better chronology, but also could explain supernatural effects on the history of humanity that empirical data alone could not provide the whole answer.
  • The Buddhist Cosmogony
  • In Buddhist cosmogony, a Kalpa is the time frame for each Buddhisatva to rule the earth and to attain his enlightenment. To accommodate the interference of the seven spiritual worlds, the Sumerian cosmogony set forth the spiritual relativity of life as due to the interference of the seven heavenly planes on earth by dividing each Kalpa into seven yugas. In practices however, only four yugas are observed; they are the Satya Yuga, Treta Yuga, Dvapara Yuga and the Kala Yuga. The division of a kalpa into its four phases (called yugas) is actually in conformance to the Buddhist teaching of the four noble truths that consists of birth, maturity, old age and death. According to Buddha Gautama's teaching, these noble truths apply to all living thing of the Meru world and other sub-worlds of both physical and spiritual as well. Carrying on the mainstream of the Man and the Meru Culture, the first two yugas bring the new kalpa into a progression of spiritual enhancement. To better understanding of cosmic forces in their role to the development of humanity, we tentatively set forth a systematic chronology that serves as the time machine of each Kalpa (Notes: The Chronology of our current Kalpa). Brahma would start the Kalpa with the Satyayuga that, according to the Sumerian tradition, is considered to be the best of all the yugas. Presented as the cow Nanda standing on its four legs, the yuga is best suit for the birth of new humanity under the Sun Culture. Presented as the cow Nanda standing on its three legs, the Treta Yuga is considered as the second best yuga. Under the Moon Culture, Siva or Meru would rule the Yuga to watch over the grow of humanity into maturity of which he exerts all his power of both creation and destruction to keep humanity 's progression of its spirituality in check. The next two yugas however would emphasize on the physical aspect of it. From the degradation of the Moon Culture to the lunar eclipse, the next Dvapara yuga is delegated to the ruler of second heaven Anu and his siblings Ellil and Enki of the green energy. Presented as the bull Nanda standing on its two legs, the yuga concern mostly on humanity 's drive for material gain. The last of the four yugas that is also considered as the worst yuga of all four is the Kala yuga. It was ruled by the Kali goddess (Ishtar in Sumerian) who was known also as the war goddess. The solar eclipse culture would be based entirely on the Red energy. During the last part of it yuga, the Buddhasatava could attain his enlightenment and subsequently guide meritual souls toward salvation. We could easily check out that We are now in the last stage of the kalayuga through which wars and all sort of calamities inflicted on humanity are the norm. It is important to note that the start of a Buddhist kalpa and its duration varies depending upon the condition and the achievement of each Buddha. For most of the cases, 12,500 years is the norm of an average Kalpa.

    From the Meru Culture, we know that it was for the spirit of gods that the physical body of the anatomically modern men was created. The gods Lgigi was the first to have their physical body conceived in human form according to a supernatural process of a cell's formation as the basic component of a living organism. As a cell contains all gnome information about the living organism itself, including its ancestral inheritance, DNA analysis became a scientific breakthrough that revolutionizes the history of humanity. Used in a complementation with other methodologies, DNA analysis allows us to look back into the past of modern men conception. Nevertheless, we shall keep in mind that at least according to its current application, DNA analysis can not tell between a god and a man physical difference.

    The Evolution of Archaic Human Species
    Archeology unearthed three layers of Old Stone Age that represents three phases of Archaic development of human species. Spanning from approximately 2.6 million years ago to 280,000 years ago, the Lower Paleolithic describes a period in African prehistory in which the first stone tools were developed. Among them, archeologists also found fossils of early hominids that could be the one who made and used the tools. The earliest one that were discovered in Ethiopia included the complete specimen of the famous Lucy. The discovery definitely confirms that Africa was the birthplace of the early Archaic Human Species. The bio-diversity of Africa had been since viewed by the Darwinist natural selection group as the birthplace of human speciation. Both antropologists and geneticist agreed that in these early development, environment is the determinatimg factor of the physical adaptation of which gnome mutation occurred to characterize the birth of a new specie. With that reasoning, we do agree with Darwin that species evolved and that archaic human species in particular, evolved from chimpanzes in Africa. Nevertheless, we believe that Darwin was wrong to claim that natural selection process was the only cause of physical transformation of a new specie of different kind. Through archeology, scientists could trace a great leap of humanity as Homo erectus that evolved into a more advanced species around a million years later, and more advanced tools were found widespread used among their communities. For the next development in Africa, we shall argue that the evolution of the man species along with their life-style were closely monitored by divine intervention. The Middle Paleolithic (or Middle Paleolithic) is the second subdivision of the Paleolithic as it is understood in Europe, Africa and Asia. The term Middle Stone Age is used as an equivalent or a synonym for the Middle Paleolithic in African archeology, broadly spanned from 300,000 to 30,000 years ago. The technology demonstrates an increase in brain development and complexity in Homo erectus, as shown by the increased level of forethought and knowledge of material required for production of the tools. Homo erectus are also associated with the first instances of "modern human living," such as fire, "modern emotions," and art. The earliest evidence for hominins controlling fire is found in Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa. As much as scientific communities attributes these progression to local ingenuity of the man-species, the religious communities attributes them to the Brahmanist intervention in the early start-up of humanity. Recorded in the Rig-Vedas, gods of different nature and function introduced the art of living to humanity with their surrounding nature. It was the recollection that Meru was behind the developments of new species and their way of life (Historical Science: Relativity in Historical Science: The Origin of Life). The Upper Paleolithic (or Upper Paleolithic, Late Stone Age) is the third and last subdivision of the Paleolithic that was broadly dated between 50,000 and 10,000 years ago. According to some theories, the late Stone Age differentiated itself completely from its previous two Paleolithic stages. It was characterized with the appearance of behavioral modernity and most importantly with more sophisticated community life-style. No suggestion however was given to explain how the culture started at the first place. The discovery of the Hofmeyr Skull confirms the morphological resemblance of modern men to homo-sapien, yet its physical difference from recent groups of modern Africa specimen hardly suggests that he was actually African (Notes: The Hofmeyr Skull). Another discovery that puzzled scientific communities was that the upper Paleolithic culture did not start at Africa, but at Europe and Asia. The finding challenge the Dawinist claim that modern men were conceived through natural selection process from the archaic human kinds, the same way that they themselves evolved from their own previous ancestors. As much as Africa is the Eden of archaic human species and that evolution (of both natural and divine selection) had contributed to many new and extinct archaic human species, the new evidences show that homo-sapiens were created through a total different process than the archaic human kinds. As a matter of fact, the first breaches of homo-sapiens were not African, but were according to the Sumerian source, the gods Lgigi whose mission in Africa and later in Europe were hinted by the Middle Eastern tradition of Mesopotamia. They were physically conceived in homo-sapien form to work on the next development of humanity.

    The Out-of-Africa Migration Theory
    Among many theories that explain the peopling of the earth, the theory of modern men's migration from Africa was the most accepted one among scientific communities. The theory went on to claim that migration, in facts multiple migration, was the cause of modern men 's spreading over the globe. Members of homo-sapien family who constitute themselves as the man-species of the earth, exited Africa and made their way to find better living around the globe in many occasions through land-channel that open for them to make their migration. The theory however did not elaborate on how this new man species was concepted at the first place, but asserts that the homo-sapien appeared for the first time in the archaeological record around 200,000 BCE in Africa. Around 70,000 years ago, they claim that anatomically modern humans started to exit Africa in the destination to South Asia, Maritime South Asia and Oceania by the southern coastal way that gave the migrants the identity of beachcombers. They reached Oceania around 65,000 years ago and possibly the Americas by 50,000 years ago. As we shall argue later, the theory was very much in a conjectural stage and was so far lacks the anthropological evidences to support the claim. With no date stamps on the DNA's analysis finding the window of uncertainty was high for the geneticists to make a sound judgment of the finding. What makes this theory much more challenging is the discovery of the archaic gnome's presence in modern men's DNA that was significant enough to suggest a generic mixture between the two species. Neanderthal admixture, in the range of 1-4%, is found in all modern populations outside of Africa, including in Europeans, Asians, Papuan New Guineans, and Australian Aboriginals. On the other hand, the extent of Denisovan admixture varies significantly between contemporary Asian racial groups. The admixture is of the order of about 1% to 4% in Europeans and East Asians, and highest among Melanesians cluster B is defined as those with the Asians 9-bp deletion and, as previously mentioned, spreads from Melanesia round the Pacific Rim to the Americas. This ancestral type is shared with the equivalent model type in Amerindian and coastal New Guinea population. The admixture suggests that modern men were in contact with their archaic peers and one way or another had their gnome mixed. To explain the presence of archaic gnome as part of modern men's ancestral DNA, the Out-of-Africa migration theory needs an elaborate mass interbreeding theory between modern men and their archaic human counterpart that was very much left unproved. As much as the mass interbreeding is highly hypothetical, we shall argue that natural interbreeding between two different species hardly happen in natural world. For instance, an interbreeding between a mule and a horse could be monitored under close environment and condition, but natural interbreeding between them are hardly observed in a normal situation. On the other hand, the condition and the time frame questions very much the assertion that modern men were conceived and evolved in Africa. The absence of the upper Paleolithic period simply suggests that homo-sapiens were not conceived in Africa as thought. The same evidences could be used to show that archaic human species instead of modern men who trekked out from Africa, during the late stage of middle period of Paleolithic period. Consistent with the animal mass migrating behavioral tendency to look for better habitat, the archaic human species moved out from Africa to spread around the world and to become later the preceptors of modern men. The Neanderthals were probably the first to settle down in Western Europe while the rest continued the journey toward the east. Evidences show that one group made their detour into Southeast Asia and furthermore into the southernmost territory of Australia while the rest of the flock continued on their migration to the east. The Darwinist theory of natural selection process would explain the next emergence of the Denisovan who, through DNA analysis, had already their gnome diverged from that of their ancestor Neanderthals. By following the same path, evidences show that the Denisovan also made their way south while the rest of their peers continued on their journey to the eastern part of the Chinese continent (Notes: The Java Man vs the Peking Man). Reflecting their common origin from Africa, the austronesian tribesmen appears to share the same tradition of their northern journey with their Chinese counterpart. To make it more interesting, they acknowledge that their ancestors were monkeys and that they lost their tail in a long journey crossing the desert (perhaps the Sahara Desert) during their early exit from Africa. It was perhaps a shared recollection of their out-of-Africa migration when they were still primate, long before they were conceived as modern men.

    The Multiregional Theory of Human Origin
    The out-of-Africa migration theory was challenged from the start by the the multiregionalist group who, trough their anthropologist works, found more evidences that modern men were conceived from their own local archaic ancestors. Of their paleoanthropology findings, they maintained that homo-sapiens were not all from the same archaic ancestry that explains why they possessed different background of archaic gnome. Since each broke out from different ancestors, they would inherit many of their archaic legacies that show the Neanderthals or the Denisovans admixture in their gnome. The finding would make the multiregional theory of human origin ahead of the Out-of-Africa migration theory. Without the interbreeding hypothetical assemption, the latter theory is not complete as it left the presence of the archaic gnome in modern men 's DNA out of its development. THe only problem for the multiregional theory is the lack of support argument to explain why the physical resemblance to modern men took place while their anatomy is so far different from their primal ancestors (OOA: Out of Africa, p.49). In contrast, the out-of-Africa migration of homo-sapiens gives immediate explanation that the same look of modern humans was inherited from their common African ancestors. With the abscense of the upper Paleolithic development in Africa that confirms the presence of homo-sapiens in Africa and the absence of concrete proof of interbreeding between modern men with archaic humem ever took place. we shall argue that the Out-of-Africa migrations of modern men never take place. In fact, the Sumerian source conveys to us that the early homo-sapiens that presented themselves across the globes were actually not men, but were the god Lgigi from both the Apsu and Tiamat communities of Brahmans. Furthermore, the Sumerian source also assert that the conception of modern men was rather recently and that the migration through out the globe if it happened, must to occur before the conception of modern men. As we have argued, it was around 75,000 years ago that the first of the modern men who populated Southeast Asia were conceived, right after the explosion of the Toba's eruption. Better recognized by their genetic markers HbE, the austroasiatic speaker Orang-Asli were the ancestors of the Khmer-mon people (Notes: The Orang-Asli People). Of their close relationship with the Brahman gods Lgigi, they were known to be agriculturist. Perhaps through their association with members of the high gods whose global mission in Middle East was particularly known through the Sumerian culture, they were known in the Arab world as the Kamara people. Of their Kun-lun origin, they were known to the Chinese as the Kun-lun people. The spread of agriculture through out the world might have been associated to their works in close association with the Sumerian gods Lgigi. Gene analysis confirms their presence through out the Middle East, including Europe, the Chinese continent and the oceania (EE: Orang Asli-originals: fig 34: p.206). These evidences show that modern men were not (according to scientific claim) migrating from Africa to Asia, but the other way around. Continuing on the Sumerian tradition, East Africa was actually the destination of Southeast Asian Sea nomads and became since the cultural development center of the Sumerian court, along with Egypt and Middle East. Evidences even show that later on, a high number of the Kamara had escaped to Madagascar of Southeast Africa to escape the Han' s intrusion (Champapura: The Impact on the Tian Legacy: The Displacement of the Kun-Lun People). In any cases, the Kamara people could not be beachcomber from Africa as claimed by the out-of-Africa of modern men theory, but were instead conceived locally at Southeast Asia. During their conception, evidences show that the survivors of the Toba explosion continued their archaic living with their Middle Paleolithic life-style. The epic story of Atrahasis coveys that as late as the last kalpa of Buddha Kassapa (around 14000 years ago), the gods Lgigi had to perform the works themselves because there were no men to do the work for them. Their complaints forced the god Enki to create human being to off-load their hard work and only then that modern men were seen to spread themselves through out the world. The Sumerian source furthermore conveys that they were conceived trough god cloning process by mean of local archaic mothers who were most likely offspring of the Java men. The religious proposition of god cloning would gives the multiregional of human population theory, the upper edge over the out-of-Africa migration of modern men counterpart, as it clearly explains how homo-sapiens were conceived locally from their archaic mothers.

    We had argued that the empirical method of DNA analysis and Linguistic study fell short to provide the whole answer of the history of humanity. More information could be retrieved through currently available religious sources of many established branches of the Meru Culture to complement what we have known trough scientific institutions. The Sumerian chronicle of the Atrahasis for instace, is of particular importance in providing additional information about supernatural process concerning the creation of man species. Weshall present here some case studies that had been published for possible review that might shed better truth for the history of humanity.

    From Archaic to Modern Men
    Another big hole that the out-of-Africa of modern men's migration theory had to patch-up is the lack of upper Paleolithic development in both Africa and Middle East where the theory had suggested to be colonized long before the spreading of modern men into Europe and Asia. The finding convinced some geneticists that being homo-sapien is not a guaranty of being smart. To explain why upper Paleolithic life-style took place in Europe rather than in Africa where homo-sapien supposed to be originated from, the Darwinist natural selection process appears to solve the problem. They really believed that European was gifted with a special wisdom gene that gave them the upper edge of progressive life-tyle than their African peers. The wrong proposition had turned later into the European basic belief of racism to impact humanity in the worst way during the modern history of mankind. At the same time, we had argued that modern men were conceived in close development of god intervention on earth to allow Brahman spirits that failed the enlightenment a second chance of accomplishing it. In God's plan of reorganizing the earth, the Kamara people were conceived along with the gods Lgigi in human form to take care of all living thing on earth. Following the final change from Middle Paleolithic to the upper Paleolithic tools that was found in the Central Nrmada and Middle Son Basins in northern India, archeology confirm the emergence of the same culture in the Levant and Europe, 25,000-3000 years later (OOE: Out of Africa: The southern route, p.73). We shall further argue that the upper Paleolithic culture, as any major change of modern men's culture, was originated by the Brahman societies of Southeast Asia. It was happening the same time that Christianity commemorated the birth of modern men toward a grand scale of God's plan for spiritual salvation. In that setting, the birth of Adam was to be treated as the earliest development of leadership out of the Senoi stock of which scholars dated to be between 40,000 and 50,000 years ago. The conception of the austroasiatic speaker Senoi people along side of their Orang Asli peers would fit into the same time-frame and circumstances of the formation of the race of Paramkambuja of Southeast Asian tradition. Evidences show that they were conceived at the same time, in a parallel development if it was not earlier than the conception of the race of the western Kambuja in Europe. In India where archeology confirms that the Toba explosion had wiped out all living things, plenty of land would accommodate agriculture for modern men to move in. While evidences show that mass migration from Europe took place later until modern time, the south of the Indian peninsula became immediately the safe heaven for the Paramkambujan migrants to practice their agriculturist life-style. Demographically, the main physical type of Indian population that generally changes toward darker skinned, curly haired, round eyed of the so-called Dravidian peoples would confirm their early migration into the Tamil country. Furthermore, comparisons of skull shape allows scholars to link the large Tamil population of South India with the Senoi people (OOE: First step into Asia, first leap into Australia: p.181). On the same development, the conception of their western Kambuja compatriots who had themselves also Neanderthal archaic root would complete the creation of Adam of the Abrahamic School's tradition. Living closely together with the Senoi people, the austronesian speakers could be treated as the next creation of Eve to be the wife of Adam. We know from the Sumerian epic story of Atrahasis that their conception as modern human came far later than their siblings the Kamara people who were no other than the Orang Asli and the Senoi people. Ethnically, we had argued that they were conceived as modern men in a close relationship with the Denisovan archaic ancestry of Southeast Asia. The communion of the Kambuja and the Austronesians would complete the creation story of modern men and the start of a new family life-style of which scholars had attributed to a cultural leap that rendered their archaic ancestral communities to be obsolete (Notes: The Austronesian Language). From the Sumerian sources, we know that their conception (in a grand scale generation) of modern men did not follow the mainstream guideline of the Meru Culture. It was actually the god Ea (Enki in Sumerian) who initiated the creation of the new man species through duplication of a god's gnome and it was Ishta who took care of building up their communities and life-style after their conception. Evidences show that while many of them were inducted into the Meru culture and absorbed into the Kamara society, many others would swear their allegiance to Anu and even to Ishta instead.

    The Genetic Issues
    For some geneticists 's view point, the wisdom gene is all it take for modern men to accomplish human civilization of today. In a sense, they were right since according to the Sumerian tradition, modern men possessed the gene of god and without it they could not be homo-sapien. Nevertheless, they were wrong by claiming that possessing the wisdom gene alone would do all the trick of humanity's progression. As much as genetic mutation could accommodate to surrounding environment, but could not produce the wisdom gene at the first place. Even then, modern men' s potential is still very much bound to its spirituality. According to Christianity, it took a lot more of God's will and care to get men conforming themselves to God's rule. Still men failed to follow through all their responsibility and at the end, rebelled against God. Chased out from the garden, Adam and Eve gave birth to Cain and Abel. As Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel should not be treated as persons, but rulers of two distinct peoples of different life-style. DNA analysis might detect their common heritage that could trace their early history back to Southeast Asia. Cain was the line of the first male founder in Eastern Indonesia, Australia, and New Guinea that were obviously his birthplace. On the other hand, Abel line was seen resurrected later in an African of west Eurasian branch, the Bantu peoples. There were no evidences that both brothers had left any legacies at all in Middle East before the incidence. It was the third son of Adam, Seth who carried on the next development that brought Middle East into the Neolithic stage. At its debut, farming communities had arisen in the Levant by 10,200-8800 BC to spread later to Asia Minor, North Africa and finally to Mesopotamia. Nevertheless, Seth's development at Middle East was like that of his two brothers Cain and Abel, limited. Originated in Southeast Asia, Seth's trail into Middle East development left an heavy trace in India where two-thirds of the world of the major founder Eurasian lines is found, the Manju (M) and its sister clan Nasreen (N). The out-of-Africa of modern men migration proponents claimed that the two sister lines came from Africa to establish themselves in South Asia as part of the beachcomber migration (OOE: Out of Africa: The first Asian Adam and Eve's clans: p.83). As the Out-of-Africa (inclufing the beach combing) of modern men had been refuted, our argument is that the two sister lines were actually inherited from the archaic gnome of the Neanderthal stocks. The Manju was actually the line of the ParamKambuja of which Cain was originated from, while the Nasreen was instead the line of the western Kambujas who were conceived locally in Europe. Geneticists detected that Cain's line the Manju, is moving on around the Indo-pacific coast to Japan and Korea, where they formed the early colonies there (OOE: Out of Africa: Adam's story, p.236). Wrongly associated as part of the beachcomber migration of modern men, the displacement was actually the outcome of Abel's assassination. Cain 's legacy did not stop there and in a circle of fate, one of his descendants brought his Kambujan legacy back to the Levant, many centuries later (Notes: Cain's direct Offspring). Through Grete, the Caanite societies flourished to become the big player in the new foundation of the Greek Empire and the subsequent establishment of Anyang by the Shang Dynasty of China (The Sakadvipa: The Birth of the Sakan Nation: The Sakan Mythology). Among the seven East Asian maternal lines of Eve, the oldest Southeast Asian lines, B and F reach the deepest diversity among Indochinese aboriginal groups suggesting that they were at home from the start of humanity. Mirroring the ancient distribution of the Sundadonty, scholars refer to Southeast Asia as their origin. The pre-F group R9 is common in the Aboriginal Malay homeland. It is also found in South China (Yunnan and Guangxi), Indochina, Sumatra, Andaman and Nicobar islands (OOE:The early Asian division: p. 232). In contrast to the theory of austronesian migration from China through Taiwan, evidences show instead that the Sundadonty's austronesian lines B and F were conceived in Southeast Asia. After the flood, evidences show that the Miens made their way up-north to Tibet, Mongolia, and Northest along the Pacific coast. The distribution could be associated to their assistance for the gods Lgigi in the world development that started from Middle East to extend itself into the northeast part of the Chinese continent. The intermingling between the gods Lgigi with the modern man would produce the race of giants that became since members of the Anunnakis. A specific account of the Bible book of Genesis conveys of the race of giant being conceived by the close association of their relationship.
    There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.(HB: 6/4: p. 4)
    . To their own peers, they were considered as demi-gods and were accepted as their superiors. They were at first apprenticed of the gods Lgigi who fathered them, but soon were recruited to work for the god Anu' s court and became known as the Anunnaki.

    The Spirituality Issues
    The development of the austronesian speaking people was proved to happen a lot later after the Toba's explosion. A Malay archeologist team that conducted a scientific study on the effect of the Toba explosion had come out an astounding finding. From their data, scholars concluded that only occupants of the Kota Tampan were affected and others communities on the Malay Peninsular were able to escape and continued to live their Paleolithic tradition. The discovery of an anatomically modern man whom scholars named the Perak Man (Notes: The Perak Man) had brought a new finding on the conception of the austronesian people. On the basis of the skull morphology comparison, scholars concluded that the aboriginal people who still lives in the same part of northern Malaysian rain forest, are his descendants (OOE: Out of Africa: Oldest relics of the beachcombing trail?, p.169). The fact that the same tools that lied embedded in volcanic ash from Toba, could also be found in the rest of the archipelago suggests that the survivors of Toba explosion of Malaysia continued their archaic living until the birth of the Perak Man. The Malay team also discovered a number of sites in the Lenggong valley indicating that a local pebble tool culture may have existed from the days of the Toba eruption right up until 7,000 or even only 4,000 years ago (OOE: Out of Africa: Oldest relics of the beachcombing trail?, p.167). The finding is consistent with the timeline of the Sumerian epic story of Atrahasis to date the conception of the austronesian man species by the god Enki only until 600 years before the Southeast Asian Great Flood. We shall further assert that the Perac Man could actually be one of the first specimen of modern man species created by Enki to offload the Lgigi work through a supernatural process of god cloning (Atrahasis: The Creation of the Man Species: The Cloning Process). A scientific observer who was not informed of the supernatural process, could be easily mistaken that the whole macroevolution process was actually what Darwin was calling the natural selection process. He would first observe the seven archaic women giving birth to seven boys and the other mothers giving birth to seven girls. All the mothers might be at first under high mental trauma to see that their babies were born with strong physical abnormality as compared to other archaic babies. Since according to the story, they were soon separated from their babies, the trauma lasted obviously only for a short time. By mating between themselves, they built their communities to grow stronger and stronger while their archaic ancestral communities started to degenerate and became extinct in a short time later. The observer must to be perplex of his observation since according to Darwin's theory of natural selection process, the evolution of a new kind of specie is expected to take a long period of time to complete its course. Born in the image of god, the new men kept their own spirit of lower status. Through their homo-sapien shape and form, their godly potential was enhanced. Evidences show that many had joined the Kamara people into the mainstream of the Meru Culture and became like them. Conceived to help the gods Lgigi building the irrigation works at Middle East, the austronesians end-up becoming themselves farmers of the new site. Chronologically, the start of farming in the Middle East was consistent with the conception of the austronesian people and their induction to join the Kamara people as part of the agriculturist society of Southeast Asia. Historian however failed to relate the Mesolithic development of Southeast Asia actually proved itself to be the first agriculturist culture of the world, as the stepping stone of the next worldly Neolithic development. Also known as the "New Stone Age", the Neolithic began about 12,000 years ago after the first development of farming appeared in the Middle East. Before it spread into other parts of the world. In a period marked by the upper Paleolithic culture, Europe became the birthplace of the new generation of human race. From their own records, scholars had compiled a list of behavioral progression that was found to be the backbone of the next Neolithic culture of modern men (Notes: Abstract Features of Modern Men). Nevertheless, the humanity' s success story did not last long. As indicated by the epic story of the Atrahasis, the austronesian communities were for a short period of time (600 years) thriving under the care of Ishta. As their number grew, they became corrupted and their unruly behavior finally drove the god Ellil to unleash the great flood upon them. Under the guidance of Ea (Enki in Sumerian) some survived and after the flood, were absorbed into the austroasiatic society and were introduced to the agriculturist life-style of the Khmer-mon people.

    There are still hot debates between scientific and Christian communities about the occurrence as well as the condition and the magnitude of the flood deluge, which according to the Bible book of Genesis was of God's intention to wipe humanity out from the surface of the earth. It repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth and it grieved him at his hearth to see the wickedness of man was great in the earth and that his hearth was continuously evil.

    The Flood Deluge
    Once again relativity had played a little trick on the interpretation of Book of Genesis 's specific passage.
    I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both men and beast, and the creeping thing ; and the fowls of the air; for its repenteth me that I have made them. (HB: 6/7: p. 4)
    No word in the passage indicates that it was a global flood, but the gravity of the intended desaster misled orthodox Christians into believing that it was global and of high magnitude. In reference to the Great Flood of Southeast Asia, it is clear that the compiled story of the Bible's epic flood could not be literally interpreted as really happening. Even though it meant to be a catastrophic event, the flood' s original statement lost most of its literal meaning when it comes to the real event. Not only that the flood was local, evidences also show that austronesians were not all perished and after the flood, many survivors continued to live in Southeast Asia while other were checking out surrounding areas for possible resetllement. As confirmed by the Sumerian epic story of Atrahasis in making its clear reference to the Apsu Seashore as the actual site of the flood (Atrahasis: The Meru Connection: The Effect of Kalayuga), the flood was local to Southeast ASia. This seemingly discrepency in perception was, as we shall see, relative to the bias view of the orthodox Christian communities whose, through mostly literal interpretation of the book of Genesis believe in the young age of the earth and humanity that comes along with it. They believe that God created both the earth and its humanity through a supernatural process the same manner that a magician make a pigon appearing and disappearing on verbal commands during the magic show. To them, the flood could be the same one that wiped the dinosaurs from the surface of the earth, which according to archeological finding was global. The young earth theory went far to state that modern men who were then conceived and lived along side the dinosaurs were perished also in the same flood. Needless to say, the theory contradicts with scientific finding that both the earth and the dinosaurs were old and that the dinosaur extinction actually occured millions of years ago. As much as we agree with the scientific communities of the old earth theory, we also agree with the Christian communities that humanity was created by God and was still young when the flood was unleashed (also by God) upon them. In that setting, we could relate the Noah's flood to the same great flood of Southeast Asia that was happening right at the end of last kalpa, in 10,000 BC. Furthermore, we shall argue that the whole of Christian cosmogony is based entirely on the same Sumerian tradition of humanity development. By associating a day of the Bible's cosmology to be not literally an earth's day, but a day of the Brahma's world, we shall match the two last Buddhist Wara and Saramanda kalpas to the Bible 's account of God's reorganization of the earth and heaven in seven days. With the same association, we had identified that the first creation of men during the sixth day was actually the formation of the Kamara people, right after the Toba explosion around 73,000 BC. It also explains why Christians had the tendency of treating the great flood as global since it involved a young humanity that was then still small to make Southeast Asia as the whole earth (Kia) of the Christian cosmology. In Sumerian terminology, the word Kia was not a reference to the physical earth, but to the country of human kinds. Relative to the Bible global flood's magnitude, Southeast Asia was meant to be where humanity was taking hold and thus the target of the real flood. Another twist in the interpretation of Bible flood's duration, the seven days of raining should be counted as earth's days. Nevertheless, since the collapse of the Southeast Asian tectonic plate also was taking place, it took more time for the flood to subside. At the mean time, the search for the surrounding dried land occurred by some of the restless flood survivors who were anxious to start their new lives away from the flood's zone. As indicated by their tradition, the Mnongs' first exploration was through the rough mountain top of the north Kun-lun range of the mount Himalayas of which they settled and became known later as the Kun-lun people (Prehistory: The Flood Myth: The Mnong's Journey toward the Mountaintop). The real venturing out from Southeast Asia was however done through the southern sea by the people who already mastered the seafaring and could sustain themselves through the product of the sea (Prehistory: The Flood Culture: The Fish People and the Journey back to the Sea). Evidences show that the new created austronesian speaking people who survived the flood were among the first to move out from the flood area looking for better environment to suit their new life-style. Through their close contact with the proto-malay seafaring people, they became sea-nomads themselves. Nevertheless, evidences show that through the god's network they stayed connected to their original birthplace that was Southeast Asia. Historically, Through the creation of the southern tribesmen of the Sundaland who in close connection with the Brahman community of mount Himalayas, Southeast Asia became the cultural center for humanity spreading itself all around the physical earth.

    The Start-up of the Neolithic Culture
    For the Kamara people who relied on agriculturist life-style, migrating to a far away land was not a viable solution. Their only option was to wait patiently alongside their gods for the flood to subside. After the Mnong's exploration, they established themselves deep on the Tian Shan range of which they received their second identity as the Tians. Others settled on the Kun-lun mountain range of which they received their identity as the Kun-lun people. Under the guidance of King Samanta and his descendants, they built their communities on agriculturist life-style that became later the core culture of the mainland Indochina that became known later as the Man Culture.
  • The Man Culture

  • The Man Culture was the first of its peers that started by king Samanta himself right after the great flood of Southeast Asia. As the ruler of this current kalpa, he would reign through his descendants as the god kings of human kinds communities. Their activities would not be restricted to Southeast Asia only, but were spread out over the whole world wherever humanity was. As a matter of fact, evidences show that Mesolithic development at Southeast Asia was slow, perhaps due to the lack of cultivable land. In contrast, archeology shows that development at Middle East was picking up very fast. From around 10,000 BC, Mesopotamia clearly became the site of the earliest developments of the Neolithic Revolution. Unlike in Southeast Asia, there were no evidences whatsoever of flood impact to the local development. Two locations between the rivers Tigris and Euphrate, Kurdistan and Ur, represented the extension of the Garden of Eden in its important role of the next humanity' s development in Middle east (The Book of Genesis: Of God and his Creation: Of Heaven and Earth). Based according to the findings of its specific progression as recorded in the archeology's finding. Scholars split the Neolithic development into three different phases. To start, Neolithic farming was limited to a narrow range of plants, both wild and domesticated, which included einkorn wheat, millet and spelt, and the keeping of dogs, sheep and goats. In the proto-Neolithic Natufian cultures, wild cereals were harvested, and perhaps early seed selection and re-seeding occurred. Scholars agreed that the agriculturist advances continued into the Neolithic 1 of which farming became now fully developed. The grain was ground into flour. Emmer wheat was domesticated, and animals were herded and domesticated (animal husbandry and selective breeding). Scientific communities might argue that modern men mastered this progression on their own with the help from nature in providing wild crop for domestication. However, the discovery of remains of figs in a house in Jericho that dated to 9400 BC would require a different thought experiment on how the fig tree was available to modern men at the first place. The figs are of a mutant variety that cannot be pollinated by insects, and therefore the trees can only reproduce from cuttings. This evidence suggests that figs were the first cultivated crops and marks the invention of the technology of farming to occur centuries before the first cultivation of grains have ever taken places in Middle East. Early sites dating to around 9500-9000 BC have been found in Jericho, West Bank (notably Ain Mallaha, Nahal Oren, and Kfar HaHoresh), Gilgal in the Jordan Valley, and Byblos, Lebanon. Scientific communities might associate the development to local ingenuity, but for the natives of both Southeast Asa and Middle East, the credit went directly to divine intervention. From their own recollection, Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern communities are the forefront among other part of the world to recognize divine interference on the foundation of the earth civilization. A temple area in southeastern Turkey at Göbekli Tepe, dated to around 9500 BC, may be regarded as the beginning of the period. From the lack of permanent housing in the vicinity, the site was obviously not built for human kind' s standard linving, but as a place of worship instead.
  • The Meru Culture

  • Started at the Levant (Jericho, Palestine), the Neolithic 2 might begun since 8800 BC, but its full development was not noticed only later during the Tretayuga that last between 7,500 BC to 2,500 BC. The Sumerian tradition credits a descendant of king Samanta named Meru and his son Mahameru to start on the next development of the Moon Culture at Middle Eastern farther west. Among its key development, the domestication of sheep and goats was brought from the Middle East as early as 6000 BC, the plant and animal domestication was not until the early fifth millennium BC in northern Egypt and a thousand years later at further south. It is important to note that animal husbandry might start earlier by the second son of Adam, Abel. His intense rivalry with his elder brother Cain and his murder by the latter might have been the reason why the industry had to wait until the arrival of the Meru Culture to be fully developed. By about 6900-6400 BC, it included domesticated cattle and pigs, the establishment of permanently or seasonally inhabited settlements, and the use of pottery. In other parts of the world, such as Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia, independent domestication events led to their own regionally distinctive Neolithic cultures, which arose completely independently of those in Europe and Southwest Asia. It proves that very much like its predecessor the Man Culture, the Meru Culture was decentralized and spread itself around the world to suit humanity. In both cases, scholars agree that as much as local developments was due to indigenous ingenuity, the primary stimulus for agriculture, domesticated animals and Neolithic cultural features was common to all regions. An array of Neolithic artifacts, including bracelets, ax heads, chisels, and polishing tools. Neolithic stone artifacts are by definition polished and, except for specialty items not chipped. Settlements became more permanent, with circular houses, much like those of the Natufians, with single rooms. However, these houses were for the first time made of mud-brick. The settlement had a surrounding stone wall and perhaps a stone tower (as in Jericho). The wall served as protection from nearby groups, as protection from floods, or to keep animals penned. Some of the enclosures also suggest grain and meat storage.

    The Late Neolithic Culture
    According to the Bible book of Genesis, the spread of Noah's three sons Ham, Sem and Jephet after the flood constituted the main event of humanity's next development. Western tradition mentions that Ham's settlement was at Africa while Sem's settlement was at Middle East and Jephet's development was to take place in Central Asia. Historically, they should not be treated as persons, but as groups of people who after surviving the flood established themselves around the globe under the guidance first of the Man culture. Their development also were not simultaneously taking place, but with different time frame with a long elapse time of their own. Being the eldest brother, Ham was more connected with the Meru Culture than his two brothers were to the Man Culture. Unlike the latter that was transplanted directly to the west through Middle east, evidences show that the Meru Culture was first transplanted at the east before it moved to Middle East through Central Asia. Named after the Moon God Jin (Tsin in Sumerian), the culture was also Known as the Jin of which China got its identity. As Meru started his debut at the east, his global development should left its trace first at India and later China. According to the Chinese source, Ta-Tsin that was meant to be the middle kingdom of the Meru cakravatin empire was first found in Manipura (Prehistory: The Flood Culture: The Xiang People and their Journey up to the Tian-Shan Range). Since then, Ta-Tsin had been moved around, bringing along the Meru Culture to implant in many part of the globe. Among its early sites of Northeast China, the Pengtoushan culture was found to be around 7500-6100 BC, and the Peiligang culture to be around 7000-5000 BC. Filling as an intermediary between the two Northern Chinese cultures, the prehistoric Beifudi culture near Yixian in Hebei Province, contains relics of a culture contemporaneous with the Cishan and Xinglongwa cultures of about 6000-5000 BC.In that case, we could identify that the Great Jin Country (Ta-Tsin) was meant to be Mongolia of today, Like the Grand Brahman country, the Great Jin (Ta-Tsin) was actually the extension of the Meru Culture worldwide outside of the Jin country proper. While the Jin country was centered at the Kun-lun range of mount Himalayas, the greater Jin country would start at northern China of which the Chinese identity was retained. As to its population, they were the same southern race Mien people of Sudadonty stock (Notes: Sundadonty vs Sinodonty). They were actually remnants of Cain descendants who as we had argued, disguising themselves as the beachcombrer polynesians before they reached America. It was Meru who made the attempts to regroup them back into the mainstream of the Meru Culture. With the assistance of his consort, the queen of the west (Ista in Sumerian) Meru transformed the Jin Culture into a full-blown Moon culture of the western civilization. Only then that Central Asia became the cultural as well as a commercial link between the Chinese continent and Middle East. Evidences also show that, the maritime connection between America and the Levant also brought the Atlantis civilization of America first time in contact with the Egyptian court of Seth. Also worth mentioning is the assistance of the Nanda (the gods Lgigi in Sumerian) who were serving in the court of Meru as ministers. Later on when Meru moved and settled down at Gangetic India, they were the same Brahmans who compiled the Vedas and established Sivaism as a branch of the the Hindu culture. In the Rig-Vedas they described their early role of Shamanism (the gods Lgigi in Sumerian) in accommodating humanity as the primordial god of fire, water, earth and wind. In the Rig-Veda, they refer Meru as Aryaman and themselves as the Aryan Brahmans. One specific aspect as mentioned in the Rig-Veda's hymn was the mentioning of the use of horse-drawn chariot to win the war against their enemies. Western scholars identified them as a group of Central Asian tribesmen who were the first to invent the wheels from the round turning table that were used to make pottery. It is implying that the Aryans were already mastering the art of making pottery, which according to scholars was of pre-Neolithic invention. Clay figurines had been found around the world, obviously with close religious connection. Following the Neolithic 3 that began around 6,400 BC in the Fertile Crescent of Middle East, distinctive cultures emerged, with pottery like the Halafian (Turkey, Syria, Northern Mesopotamia) and Ubaid (Southern Mesopotamia). Other early Neolithic sites that were connected to the same culture are Bhirrana in Haryana dated to 7570-6200 BC, and Mehrgarh, dated to between 6500 and 5500 BC, in the Kachi plain of Baluchistan, Pakistan; the site has evidence of farming (wheat and barley) and herding (cattle, sheep and goats). In South India, the Neolithic began by 6500 BC and lasted until around 1400 BC when the Megalithic transition period began. South Indian Neolithic is characterized by Ash mounds from 2500 BC in Karnataka region, expanded later to Tamil Nadu. Early Japanese societies and other East Asian cultures used pottery before developing agriculture. The Neolithic period lasted until the transitional period of the Chalcolithic from about 4500 BC, marked by the development of metallurgy that led to the explosion of the bronze age and later the iron age of the western civilization.

    1. HB: Holy Bible: The First Book of Moses called Genesis, King James Version
    2. GNB: Good News Bible, Today's English Version
    3. "./HB.html" target="Main_View"> Holy Bible: The First Book of Moses, called Genesis, King James Version
    4. MGRV: Minority groups in the Republic of Vietnam, Department of the army pamphlet
    5. OOE: Out of Eden, Stephen Oppenheimer
    6. DVVS: The Dvipavamsa: An Ancient Buddhist Historical Record, translated by Hermann Oldenberg
    7. CMC: The Xiang Mai Chronicle, by David K. Wyatt and Aroonrut Wichienkeeo
    1. Chronology
      135,000 BC: The new earth reorganization; 73,000 BC: The Toba explosion; 47,500 BC: The start of Bhadrakalpa; 10,000 BC: The Great Flood of Southeast Asia, the start of our current kalpa; 10,000-2000 BC: Hoabinhian Culture; 10,000 BC- 5,000 BC: The Satyayuga; 7,500 BC-2,500 BC: The Tretayuga; 5,000BC- 0 AD: The Dvaparayuga; 2500 BC-2500 AD: The Kalayuga;
    2. Of God's Creation
      Like the notion of God, the creation of the earth in the book of Genesis is highly abstract and could be highly controversial if literally interpreted. The earth was itself not referring to the physical earth, but to the country of human kind. At the start of its conception, humanity was small and Southeast Asia was according to the Sumerian tradition was referred as kia (earth) in separation from the heaven (Apsu and later Anu in Sumerian).
    3. Previous Known Buddhist Kalpas
      Manda Kalpa: In this kalpa, only 2 Buddhas will come to this world. Wara Kaloa: In this kalpa, only 3 Buddhas will come to this world. Saramanda Kalpa: In this kalpa, only 4 Buddhas will come to this world.
    4. The Bhadrakalpas
      The present Kalpas is called BhadraKalpas where four Buddhas had appeared in succession: Kakusandha, Konâgamana, Kassapa and Gotama. The last one to appear is Mettreyya. These teaching Buddha's are called Supreme Buddha self-enlightened one. In every kalpa, Buddha will appear only in Jambudipa in Mezzima desa or Benares. At the same location in Mettreyya Buddha's era it will be named "Ketumati".
    5. God's Physical Body
      Recent discoveries of fossils originating from what is now Israel indicate that our species (Homo-Sapiens) lived outside of Africa 185,000 years ago; some 85,000 years earlier than previous evidence suggests. It was perhaps what was left from the remains of the gods Lgigi who once had their mission at Middle East. Since they had different life and food source than modern human, archeology would doubfully find other artifacts beside their skeleton remains.
    6. The Out-of-Africa Human Migration
      The theory states that anatomically modern humans (i.e. Homo-Sapiens) began migrating out of Africa during the Middle Paleolithic around 100,000 or 70,000 years ago and began to replace earlier pre-existent Homo species breed of modern men such as the Neanderthals and Homo-erectus of the world./li>
    7. Cross-referencing in Historical Science
      Cross-referencing between two sources allows their historical data to be mutually checked for discrepancies. Contradiction (between the two sources) would tell us that at least the data of one source is wrong. No contradiction is not necessarily implying that the data is true, but is improving the authenticity to both sources in validating their historical data. The more accredited sources to be cross-referenced, the more confidence of the validity of the historical data could be established. Discrepancies could be detected and fixed through mutually self-checking. Due to its practical use, cross-referencing is often referred as a circular referencing that should not be confused with a circular reasoning of which two different propositions that are mutually implying each other could not be automatically stated as true, unless one is proved to be true.
    8. The Chronology of our current Kalpa
      The new earth reorganization at (12,500 * 7) + 47,500 BC = 135,000 BC The Bhadrakalpa started at (12,500 * 4)-2500 BC= 50,000 - 2,500 BC= 47,500 BC Our current kalpa started after the Southeast Asian flood around 10,000 BC. The Satyayuga was between 10,000 BC and 5,000 BC. The Tretayuga was between 7,500 BC to 2,500 BC. The Dvarayuga would be between 5,000 BC and 0 AD. The Kalayuga would be between 2,500 BC to 2,500 AD
    9. The Hofmeyr Skull
      The Hofmeyr Skull is a specimen of a 36,000-year-old human skull that was found in 1952 near Hofmeyr, South Africa. The Skull has a very close affinity with other Upper Paleolithic skulls from Europe, is consistent with the Out-of-Africa theory of modern men, which hypothesizes that Upper Paleolithic human groups should morphologically resemble each other. Osteological analysis of the cranium by the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology indicates that the specimen is morphologically distinct from recent groups in Subequatorial Africa, including the local Khoisan populations.
    10. The Orang-Asli People
      The Orang-Asli People were among a few aboriginal people of Southeast Asia that stayed unaffected by recent immigration. They have only 22 percent of East Asian genetic lines in their make up that is consistent with the current view that they that they are a very isolated relic people (OOE:The early Asian division: p. 264).
    11. The Austronesian Language
      We know that in many respect, the austronesians owed their legacies to the austroasiatics (Champapura: The Cosmogony of Po-Nokor: The Cham Banis and the Southern Spread of Austronesian Language). Their austronesian language might have been one of them.
    12. Cain's direct Offspring
      In collaboration to Cain's legacy, geneticists also found out that he had a progenator Asian son whose descendants were widespread in northeast Asia, in Central Asia and to the west alongside the Silk Road into Mongolia while another group proceeded deep into Americas (OOE: Out of Africa: Adam's story, p.236). It was this last group who went further to found the Atlantis (or Crete) and under the Zeus cosmogony the new Greek Hellenic Empire.
    13. The Perak Man
      Zuraina's trump card in this respect is the much publicized finding by her team of Perak Man in the Gunung Runtuh cave in the Leggon valley in 1990. Surrounded by the same class of pebbled tools, this complete skeletons of a modern human was described by experts as having Australo-Melanesian characteristics. He was about 10,000 years old (OOE: Out of Africa: Oldest relics of the beachcombing trail?, p.167)
    14. The Java Man vs the Peking Man
      The first group became the ancestors of the Java Man, the second group became actually the ancestor of the Peking Man. Due to their antiquity, we believe that both the Java and Peking men were Denisovan. Scholars later confirm that they did not have their genetic too much drifted apart, still in their own environment we believe the Java Man became more a southerner while the Peking Man remained as a northerner.
    15. Abstract Features of Modern Men
      Behavior such as abstract thinking, planning depth, symbolic behavior, music and dance are among the few of personal improvement for the requirement of living among peers in a society. In addition to self-discipline, adaptation, social norms, language, and cooperation beyond close kin are also needed for the sustainment of humanity.
    16. The young Earth Theory
      In reference to the birth of Adam and Eve as the first man and woman of the earth, the history of theirs offspring constitutes the main theme of the Genesis. As they found out through the Bible's chronology that Adam and Eve were not that ancient, some Christian scholars postulated that the earth was not that old either. As much as we do not agree that the earth was young, we do agree with them that humanity was younger than scientific communities had claimed.
    17. Modern Southeast Asia History Books
      Started with the Indianization and ended with the Cinicization, modern history books have portrayed Southeast Asia to always be subjected to colonization. The bias view correlated Southeast Asia into becoming one of the hot seat of worldly colonization to be exploited by both the colonists and theirs migrant supporters. Forced to retract back into their countries, the colonial powers still find in Southeast Asia, colonial legacies that are ready to support them for the westernization of Southeast Asia. Now that the colonial rule is over, it was the new migrant power-elite of high western educated background who could bring Southeast Asia into modern time western dependency.
    18. Buddhist Cosmogony
      According to Buddhist cosmogony, Jumbudvipa had been the hometown of four buddhahoods already. It meant that humanity should have its history started in our current world, at least since the first Buddhahood was born as a buddhisatva. Since there is no historical data from previous kappa left to look on, we limit our study on the last Kappa that was ruled by Buddha Gautama.
    19. Proof of Darwinist Natural Selection Process
      Started with Dawin 's special theory of microevolution, they extended the concept of natural selection to a more complex domain of macroevolution of all species. Hoping that along the way they would unearth more fossil to support their theories, they presented the general theory of natural selection as of scientific fact. At the same time, other scientists also introduced their own theories of the origin of life along with the same unproved scientific branch. Despite the fact that archeology failed to unearth more fossil records to support their claim, they still sustain theirs theories with the hope of future discoveries.
    20. Sundadonty vs Sinodonty